- Added by: Jie Gao, Contributed by:
Abstract: I will ask the conditional question: if folk attributions of “know” are not sensitive to the stakes and/or the salience of error, does this cast doubt on contextualism or subject-sensitive invariantism (SSI)? I argue that if it should turn out that folk attributions of knowledge are insensitive to such factors, then this undermines contextualism, but not SSI. That is not to say that SSI is invulnerable to empirical work of any kind. Rather, I defend the more modest claim that leading versions of SSI are not undermined by one particular kind of experimental result, namely the recent suggestion that knowledge attributions are insensitive to the stakes.
Comment: Suitable for an upper-level undergraduate course on epistemology for multiple purposes. It is good as a further reading for sessions on contextualism, pragmatic encroachment, philosophical methodology, and the use of experimental philosophy in epistemological theorizing.Export citation in BibTeX formatExport text citationView this text on PhilPapersExport citation in Reference Manager formatExport citation in EndNote formatExport citation in Zotero format
- Metaphysics & Epistemology
- Epistemology of Intuition
- Pragmatic Encroachment
- Epistemic Contextualism and Invariantism
- Experimental Philosophy
- Experimental Philosophy: Contextualism and Invariantism
- Experimental Philosophy, Contextualism and SSI
Experimental Philosophy, Contextualism and SSI
Brown, Jessica. Experimental Philosophy, Contextualism and SSI
2013, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research: 86 (2): 233-261.
Epistemic Contextualism and Invariantism, Epistemology, Epistemology of Intuition, Experimental Philosophy, Experimental Philosophy: Contextualism and Invariantism, Metaphilosophy, Metaphysics & Epistemology , Pragmatic Encroachment