Standpoint epistemology is committed to a cluster of views that pays special attention to the role of social identity in knowledge-acquisition. Of particular interest here is the situated knowledge thesis. This thesis holds that for certain propositions p, whether an epistemic agent is in a position to know that p depends on some nonepistemic facts related to the epistemic agent’s social identity. In this article, I examine two possible ways to interpret this thesis. My first goal here is to clarify existing interpretations of this thesis that appear in the litera- ture but that are undeveloped and often mistakenly conflated. In so doing, I aim to make clear the different versions of standpoint epistemology that one might accept and defend.This project is of significance, I argue, because standpoint epistemology provides helpful tools for understanding a phenomenon of recent interest: epistemic oppression. My second goal is to provide an analysis that makes clear how each of the readings I put forth can be used to illuminate forms of epistemic oppression.
Toole, Briana. From Standpoint Epistemology to Epistemic Oppression
2019, Hypatia 34(4), pp. 598-618.
Added by: Olivia Maegaard Nielsen
Abstract:
Comment: This is a great introductory text to standpoint epistemologies, which is suitable for people learning about them for the first time. Toole provides an easily read explanation of the basic functions of standpoints.