John Searle, in his paper on 'Minds, Brains, and Programs' (1980), argues that computational theories in psychology are essentially worthless. He makes two main claims: that computational theories, being purely formal in nature, cannot possibly help us to understand mental processes; and that computer hardware-unlike neuroprotein-obviously lacks the right causal powers to generate mental processes. I shall argue that both these claims are mistaken.
Boden, Margaret. Escaping from the Chinese Room
1988, reprinted in Mind Design III, John Haugeland, Carl Craver, and Colin Klein (eds), The MIT Press
Added by: Alnica Visser
Abstract:
Comment: Excellent summary of the Chinese Room argument along with some interesting objections. Can be used as a follow-up reading to Searle, but also in place of it.