Added by: Chris Blake-Turner, Contributed by: Anya Plutynski
Abstract: The discussion of the adaptive landscape in the philosophical literature appears to be divided along the following lines. On the one hand, some claim that the adaptive landscape is either ‘uninterpretable’ or incoherent. On the other hand, some argue that the adaptive landscape has been an important heuristic, or tool in the service of explaining, as well as proposing and testing hypotheses about evolutionary change. This paper attempts to reconcile these two views.
Comment: I use this in my philosophy of biology class to discuss the use of metaphor and analogy in science.Export citation in BibTeX formatExport text citationView this text on PhilPapersExport citation in Reference Manager formatExport citation in EndNote formatExport citation in Zotero format
Plutynski, Anya. The rise and fall of the adaptive landscape?
2008, Biology and Philosophy 23 (5):605-623.
Can’t find it?
Contribute the texts you think should be here and we’ll add them soon!