Skip to content
  • News
  • Blueprints
  • Events
  • Teach
  • Contribute
  • Volunteer
  • Support us
  • About

Diversity Reading List

Helping you include authors from under-represented groups in your teaching

Truth, Rules, Hoverflies, and the Kripke-Wittgenstein Paradox

Posted on June 28, 2020May 13, 2025 by Simon Fokt

Abstract: “[T]he sceptical argument that Kripke attributes to Wittgenstein, and even the ‘sceptical solution’, are of considerable importance regardless of whether they are clearly Wittgenstein’s. The naturalistically inclined philosopher, who rejects Brentano’s irreducibility and yet holds intentionality to be an objective feature of our thoughts, owes a solution to the Kripke-Wittgenstein paradox.” The challenge is a welcome one. Although I will argue that the Kripke-Wittgenstein paradox is not a problem for naturalists only, I will propose a naturalist solution to it. (Should the Kripke-Wittgenstein paradox prove to be soluble from a naturalist standpoint but intractable from other standpoints, that would, I suppose, constitute an argument for naturalism.) Then I will show that the paradox and its solution have an important consequence for the theories of meaning and truth. The Kripke-Wittgenstein arguments which pose the paradox also put in question Dummett’s and Putnam’s view of language understanding. From this view it follows that truth rules must be “verificationist rules” that assign assertability conditions to sentences, rather than “realist rules” that assign correspondence truth conditions. The proposed solution to the paradox suggests another view of language understanding, according to which a speaker can express, through his language practice, a grasp of correspondence truth rules.

Posted in 20th Century Philosophy, Aspects of Meaning, History of Western Philosophy, Ludwig Wittgenstein, Metaphysics & Epistemology, Philosophy of Language, Saul KripkeTagged Kripke-Wittgenstein paradox, meaning, paradox, truth, truth rulesLeave a comment

Animal Thoughts on Factory Farms: Michael Leahy, Language and Awareness of Death

Posted on May 30, 2020May 13, 2025 by Simon Fokt

Abstract: The idea that language is necessary for thought and emotion is a dominant one in philosophy. Animals have taken the brunt of this idea, since it is widely held that language is exclusively human. Michael Leahy makes a case against the moral standing of factory-farmed animals based on such ideas. His approach is Wittgensteinian: understanding is a thought process that requires language, which animals do not possess. But he goes further than this and argues that certain factory farming methods do not cause certain sufferings to the animals used, since animals lack full awareness of their circumstances. In particular he argues that animals do not experience certain sufferings at the slaughterhouse since, lacking language, they are unaware of their fate . Through an analysis of Leahy’s claims this paper aims to explore and challenge both the idea that thought and emotion require language and that only humans possess language

Posted in Animal Ethics, Applied Ethics, Value TheoryTagged awareness, death, language, LeahyLeave a comment

Game Birds: The Ethics of Shooting Birds for Sport

Posted on May 30, 2020May 13, 2025 by Simon Fokt

Abstract: This paper aims to provide an ethical assessment of the shooting of animals for sport. In particular, it discusses the use of partridges and pheasants for shooting. While opposition to hunting and shooting large wild mammals is strong, game birds have often taken a back seat in everyday animal welfare concerns. However, the practice of raising game birds for sport poses significant ethical issues. Most birds shot are raised in factory-farming conditions, and there is a considerable amount of evidence to show that these birds endure extensive suffering on these farms. Considering the fact that birds do have interests, including interests in life and not suffering, what are the ethical implications of using them for blood sports? Indeed, in the light of the suffering that game birds endure in factory farms, it may be that shooting such birds for sport is more morally problematic than other types of hunting and shooting which many people are often fiercely opposed to, for while it seems plausible to say that some animals may be harmed more by death than others (due to, say, their greater capacities), there may be harms that are worse than death (such as a life of intolerable suffering). The objective of this paper is to assess the ethics of shooting animals for sport, and in particular the practice of raising game birds for use in blood sports, by applying principles commonly used in ethics; specifically the principle of non-maleficence and equal consideration of (like) interests

Posted in Animal Ethics, Applied Ethics, Sport, Value TheoryTagged bloodsport, equality, harms, Interests, nonmaleficenceLeave a comment

The Moral Status of Sentient and Non-Sentient Creatures

Posted on May 30, 2020May 13, 2025 by Simon Fokt
Posted in Animal Ethics, Applied Ethics, Value TheoryLeave a comment

Rights, Interests and Moral Standing: A Critical Examination of Dialogue between Regan and Frey

Posted on May 30, 2020May 13, 2025 by Simon Fokt

Abstract: This paper aims to assess R. G. Frey’s analysis of Leonard Nelson’s argument (that links interests to rights). Frey argues that claims that animals have rights or interests have not been established. Frey’s contentions that animals have not been shown to have rights nor interests will be discussed in turn, but the main focus will be on Frey’s claim that animals have not been shown to have interests. One way Frey analyses this latter claim is by considering H. J. McCloskey’s denial of the claim and Tom Regan’s criticism of this denial. While Frey’s position on animal interests does not depend on McCloskey’s views, he believes that a consideration of McCloskey’s views will reveal that Nelson’s argument (linking interests to rights) has not been established as sound. My discussion (of Frey’s scrutiny of Nelson’s argument) will centre on the dialogue between Regan and Frey in respect of McCloskey’s argument. I will endeavor to update the dialogue by providing a re-interpretation of ‘rights’ in Nelson’s argument.

Posted in Animal Ethics, Animal Rights, Applied Ethics, Value TheoryTagged animals, Frey, Interests, moral standing, Regan, rightsLeave a comment

The Argument from Existence, Blood-Sports, and ‘Sport-Slaves’

Posted on May 30, 2020May 13, 2025 by Simon Fokt

Abstract: The argument from existence is often used as an attempted justification for our use of animals in commercial practices, and is often put forward by lay-persons and philosophers alike. This paper provides an analysis of the argument from existence primarily within the context of blood-sports (applying the argument to the example of game-birding), and in doing so addresses interesting and related issues concerning the distinction between having a life and living, or worthwhile life and mere existence, as well as issues surrounding our responsibilities to prospective and actual beings. However, my analysis of the argument will go beyond the animal ethics context; it is important that it does so in order to reveal the troublesome implications of the argument and to highlight the sorts of unethical practices it supports. In particular, in applying the argument to a relevant example concerning human beings, I will discuss how the argument from existence could be used to justify the ownership of slaves who were reared for slavery. My objective is to show just how problematic the argument from existence is, with the aim of laying the argument to rest once and for all.

Posted in Applied Ethics, Environmental Ethics, Sport, Value TheoryTagged animals, bloodsport, existence, obligation, slavery, sportLeave a comment

Biocentrism

Posted on May 30, 2020May 13, 2025 by Simon Fokt

Abstract: The orthodox approach to the environment and its inhabitants is deemed to be anthropocentric in that it recognises the moral standing of human beings alone, and as such other beings are given at the most indirect moral consideration when their interests conflict with the interests of humans. However, many global environmental problems and worldwide practices directly affect not just human beings but many other creatures too. In the light of this, the anthropocentric approach has been accused by some philosophers of being too narrowly focused on human interests to creditably account for the true extent of our moral obligations. This article provides a conceptual outline of biocentrism as an alternative approach to ethics; one which widens the moral scope to include all living beings as candidates deserving of moral consideration. The article also discusses how this approach might be applied to contemporary ethical issues which are international in their dimension, including environmental issues, as well as issues concerning our use of animals in worldwide human practices.

Posted in Applied Ethics, Environmental Ethics, Environmental Philosophy, Philosophy of Biology, Science Logic & Mathematics, Value TheoryTagged animals, biocentrism, environmental ethics, global warming, humans, InterestsLeave a comment

Dignity and its violation examined within the context of animal ethics

Posted on May 30, 2020May 13, 2025 by Simon Fokt

Abstract: The word ‘dignity’ may be used in a presentational sense, for example, one might say “she presents herself with dignity”, or in a social sense, for example, one might say “she fulfilled her duty with dignity, or honour.” However, in this paper I will not be using ‘dignity’ in either of these senses. Rather, the sense of dignity I will be concerned with is one that is related to ideas about the value or worth of a being. This latter sense of dignity has a long history, and tends to be a concept that is thought to be applicable to human animals only, and more specifically to human persons—moral agents, capable of rationality, of directing their own lives, and of formulating…

Posted in Animal Ethics, Applied Ethics, Environmental Ethics, Value TheoryTagged animals, circus animals, dignity, InterestsLeave a comment

Suffering, Sentientism, and Sustainability: An Analysis of a Non-Anthropocentric Moral Framework for Climate Ethics

Posted on May 30, 2020May 13, 2025 by Simon Fokt

Abstract: In the light of the current environmental crisis, different approaches to mitigating climate change have been put forward, some more plausible than others. However, despite problems with anthropocentric approaches to global warming (whether these be weak or strong versions of the approach), it seems that because of the largely anthropocentric outlook of the Western world, an internationally united approach to mitigating climate change will (perhaps inevitably) come from human-centred values. But what are the long-term implications of this? Such values need to be at the very least challenged if we are interested in providing justifiable and sustainable solutions to the current crisis. Indeed, this paper will analyse sentientism as an alternative environmental ethic stance and will discuss why it provides a more plausible approach than anthropocentric ones whilst recognising where it falls short.

Posted in Applied Ethics, Environmental Ethics, Environmental Philosophy, Philosophy of Biology, Science Logic & Mathematics, Value TheoryTagged animals, biocentrism, climate change, future creatures, Interests, sentientismLeave a comment

Games, Fair-Play and a Sporting-Chance: A Conceptual Analysis of Blood-Sports

Posted on May 30, 2020May 13, 2025 by Simon Fokt

Abstract: The killing of Cecil the lion in 2015 by a trophy hunter sparked a global debate regarding the killing of lions for ‘sport’. While many were outraged by Cecil’s killing, Cecil was just one of the millions of animals that have been used in the sports-shooting industry. Cecil’s killing brings with it the question of whether so-called ‘blood sports’ (whether these involve killing big game or smaller animals) are actually ‘sports’ at all, in the ordinary sense. As such, this paper aims to provide an analysis of blood-sport as a concept. The objective will be to examine whether blood-sports are games and to analyse to what extent, if any, blood-sports can be called ‘sports’ properly. Such an analysis will be presented through employing a generalised notion of sport and through a discussion of fair-play. Pace S. P. Morris (2014) who argues that hunting which incorporates a fair-chase code is a game and a sport, this current paper concludes that it is doubtful that blood-sport is a game, and that even if one assumes that it is a game, it cannot be classed as sport, and further that any fair-chase code undermines itself in the context of so-called ‘blood-sports’.

Posted in Animal Ethics, Animal Rights, Applied Ethics, Sport, Value TheoryTagged animals, bloodsport, ethics, fair-play, Interests, virtueLeave a comment

Posts navigation

Older posts
Newer posts

Topics

Aesthetics
(230)
Aesthetic Experience and Judgement
(106)
Aesthetic Normativity and Value
(117)
Artistic Movements
(7)
Artistry and Creativity
(16)
Ethics and Socio-Politics of Aesthetics
(90)
Individual Arts and Crafts
(95)
Metaphysics of Aesthetics
(92)
Epistemology
(264)
Applied Epistemology
(53)
Formal Epistemology
(19)
Metaepistemology
(27)
Social Epistemology
(82)
Standpoint Epistemology
(13)
Theoretical Epistemology
(158)
Metaphilosophy
(157)
Ethics and Socio-Politics of Philosophy
(56)
Historiography of Philosophy
(52)
Philosophical Biography
(15)
Philosophical Media and Methodology
(88)
Philosophical Translation and/or Commentary
(18)
Philosophy Education
(10)
The Nature Value and Aims of Philosophy
(22)
Metaphysics
(281)
Causation
(64)
Free Will
(27)
Identity and Change
(56)
Mereology
(7)
Metametaphysics
(7)
Modality
(33)
Ontology and Metaontology
(165)
Properties Propositions and Relations
(24)
Space Time and Space-Time
(26)
Truth and Truthmaking
(23)
Moral Philosophy
(576)
Applied Ethics
(383)
Descriptive Ethics
(4)
Metaethics
(178)
Moral Psychology
(24)
Normative Ethics
(143)
Philosophy of Action
(20)
Philosophy of Language
(129)
Communication
(48)
Ethics and Socio-Politics of Language
(45)
Grammar and Meaning
(81)
Language and Mind
(46)
Linguistics
(4)
Metaphysics of Language
(1)
Philosophy of Mind
(463)
Artificial Intelligence
(6)
Cognitive Science
(19)
Consciousness
(55)
Intentionality
(115)
Mental States and Processes
(352)
Metaphysics of Mind and Body
(84)
Neuroscience
(18)
Psychiatry
(16)
Psychology
(35)
Philosophy of Religion
(78)
Afterlife
(7)
Creation
(5)
Deities and their Attributes
(48)
Divination Faith and Miracles
(7)
Environment
(6)
Ethics and Socio-Politics of Religion
(5)
Religious Development, Experience, and Personhood
(39)
Theodicy
(14)
Philosophy of the Formal, Social, and Natural Sciences
(400)
Anthropology
(11)
Archaeology and History
(24)
Economics
(13)
Geography
(1)
Life Sciences
(109)
Logic and Mathematics
(173)
Physical Sciences
(106)
Psychology
(15)
Sociology
(15)
Political Philosophy
(432)
Equality
(117)
Forms of Government
(71)
Freedom and Rights
(158)
Justice
(270)
Law and Public Policy
(211)
Political Authority and Legitimacy
(37)
Political Economy
(25)
Political Ideologies
(13)
War and Peace
(17)
Social Philosophy
(706)
Class
(68)
Culture
(452)
Disability
(39)
Education
(36)
Gender Sex and Sexuality
(315)
Personal and Social Identity
(149)
Race
(165)
Sustainability
(23)
Technology and Material Culture
(12)
Work Labor and Leisure
(49)

Keywords

abortion art art classification autonomy causation Chinese philosophy colonialism Confucianism consciousness consent culture depiction desire disability equality ethics experimental philosophy feminism feminist philosophy fiction free will gender identity imagination justice Kant knowledge language logic methodology mind models oppression perception portrait race racism rationality Rawls representation responsibility science sex truth virtue

Figures

Anita Silvers Aristotle bell hooks Charles W. Mills Confucius David Hume David Lewis Delia Graff Fara Elisabeth von Böhmen Emilie Du Châtelet Friedrich Nietzsche G. E. Anscombe Georg Hegel Gottfried Leibniz Gottlob Frege Immanuel Kant Iris Marion Young Iris Murdoch Jennifer Jackson John Rawls Judith Jarvis Thomson Karl Marx Laozi Margaret Cavendish Mary Astell Mary Hesse Mary Midgley Maurice Merleau-Ponty Michel Foucault Pamela Sue Anderson Paul Grice Philippa Foot Plato René Descartes Rudolf Carnap Simone Weil Soran Reader Susan Hurley Val Plumwood Viola Cordova W. V. O. Quine Wilma Mankiller Xuanzang Zhuangzi Zhu Xi

Our Sponsors

Arts and Humanities Research Council
American Philosophical Association
British Philosophical Association
Marc Sanders FoundationMarc Sanders Foundation
Society for Applied Philosophy
American Society for Aesthetics
MIND AssociationMIND Association
University of St Andrews
Uehiro Oxford InstituteUehiro Oxford Institute
University of Manchester
University of Sheffield
The University of Leeds
The University of Edinburgh
EIDYN
British Society of Aesthetics
The White Rose College of the Arts & Humanities
  • Creative Commons Attribution license

    Unless otherwise stated, all elements of the Diversity Reading List licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Derivatives 4.0 International License
    Web Design by TELdesign Limited • Theme: Avant by Kaira

    filtration

Theme: Avant by Kaira
This site is registered on Toolset.com as a development site.