-
Expand entry
-
Added by: Clotilde TorregrossaAbstract:
Among biologists and philosophers, there is an ongoing debate over the Modern Synthesis and the Extended Evolutionary Synthesis. Some argue that our current evolutionary biology is in need of (at least) some substantial revision or nontrivial extension, while others maintain that the Modern Synthesis remains the foundational framework for evolutionary biology. It has been widely debated whether the Extended Evolutionary Synthesis provides a more promising framework than the Modern Synthesis. The nature and methodological implications of the Extended Evolutionary Synthesis were also examined. This paper offers an integrated historical and philosophical examination of the debate over the Extended Evolutionary Synthesis. It reviews the development of evolutionary biology of the twentieth century. It argues that there are substantial conceptual and theoretical differences between the Modern Synthesis and the Extended Evolutionary Synthesis, but they are not incommensurable paradigms in the Kuhnian sense. It also argues for a functional approach to the debate over these two frameworks of evolutionary theory.
Comment: The paper offers a scholarly overview of the debate over the Modern Synthesis and the Extended Evolutionary Synthesis. It takes an integrated history and philosophy of science approach to the issue. Would be suitable for an advanced course on philosophy of biology or a course on history and philosophy of science.
Shan, Yafeng. The extended evolutionary synthesis: An integrated historical and philosophical examination
2024, Philosophy Compass, e13002
Can’t find it?
Contribute the texts you think should be here and we’ll add them soon!