-
Expand entry
-
Added by: Clotilde TorregrossaAbstract:
From the introduction: It is a widely accepted feminist claim that gender injustice is not incidental and individual, but systematic and structural - it targets women as women. Feminism thus seemingly lends itself to identity politics: a form of political mobilization based on membership in women's social kind, where shared experiences or traits delimit kind membership. Essentialism may be characterized as the thesis that some of an entity's properties are necessary to it, whereas other properties are merely accidental. Classificatory anti-essentialism has been extremely influential in feminist philosophy and the failure to think intersectionally about social identities is considered to be a grave intellectual error. Classificatory anti-essentialism is not alone in challenging the viability of women's social kind. Both essentialist and anti-essentialist perspectives have afforded valuable theoretical insights, but they generate a stalemate. Individual essentialism, rather than kind essentialism, "intersects with questions of agency, and the issue of agency is central to feminist theory".
Comment: A strong introductory chapter on the issue of essentialism and anti-essentialism in metaphysics of gender. It provides a detailed overview of the literature and as such can be useful background piece in a course on Feminism and Gender, or even a course on metaphysics that touches on social kinds.
Mikkola, Mari. Gender Essentialism and Anti-Essentialism
2017, In The Routledge Companion to Feminist Philosophy, eds. Ann Garry, Serene J. Khader and Alison Stone, 168–179. New York: Routledge
Can’t find it?
Contribute the texts you think should be here and we’ll add them soon!