Added by: Simon Fokt, Contributed by: Simon Prosser
Abstract: I argue that we should reject the sparse view that there are or could be only a small number of rather distinct senses. When one appreciates this then one can see that there is no need to choose between the standard criteria that have been proposed as ways of individuating the senses—representation, phenomenal character, proximal stimulus and sense organ—or any other criteria that one may deem important. Rather, one can use these criteria in conjunction to form a fine-grained taxonomy of the senses. We can think of these criteria as defining a multidimensional space within which we can locate each of the senses that we are familiar with and which also defines the space of possible senses there could be.
Comment: A research paper, but can serve as an introduction to the issue about the individuation of the senses.Export citation in BibTeX formatExport text citationView this text on PhilPapersExport citation in Reference Manager formatExport citation in EndNote formatExport citation in Zotero format
Macpherson, Fiona. Taxonomising the Senses
2011, Philosophical Studies, 153 (2011)
Can’t find it?
Contribute the texts you think should be here and we’ll add them soon!